ResumeInsite

Examples

Different fields,
different sites.

An engineer, a new graduate, and an artist need different things in front of a recruiter. So they do not get the same page with the words swapped. These three demonstration sites show what that actually means.

janeokafor.com

Experienced hire

The engineer

Six years of history and a hiring manager who is scanning for specifics.

  • Projects open into full case studies: problem, approach, result, and what was actually hers
  • Closed by default, so a scanner gets one line and an interested reader gets the depth. Paper makes you pick one
  • A recommendation from her plant manager, sitting on the page rather than waiting to be asked for
  • Licences and certifications with verification links next to them
  • An availability status and a last-updated date, so nobody wonders whether it is stale
View the full site
priyaraman.com

New graduate

The first job hunt

One internship and a graduation date. The layout has to solve that, not apologise for it.

  • A "what I am looking for" block: role, location, start date. A resume has nowhere to put any of that
  • Projects come first, so the page opens on evidence rather than a short timeline
  • Every project carries its outcome, which is the part a resume bullet flattens into nothing
  • Skills explained in a sentence each instead of a keyword cloud, including what she has not done yet
  • A quote from her internship manager, because early on someone else saying it counts for more
View the full site
theomarchetti.com

Artist

The portfolio

Nobody hires an illustrator off a bullet list. The work has to be the first thing and most of the page.

  • The grid filters by medium as you click. A printed portfolio is stuck in whatever order it was bound
  • Work fills the screen and the resume detail sits underneath it, where it belongs
  • How a commission works, with turnaround, price floor and edition sizes stated up front
  • Press and exhibitions listed plainly, low on the page
  • Dark ground so the pieces carry the colour instead of competing with it
View the full site

The actual argument

Things a page does that paper cannot.

A prettier resume is not worth paying for. This is what you are actually buying, and every one of them is on the three sites above.

Depth without length

A resume has to fit a page, so everything gets cut to a bullet. A site shows the one-line version and hides the full case study behind it. The person skimming and the person genuinely interested both get what they came for.

Proof, not claims

Recommendations, verifiable certifications, links to work that exists. A PDF can claim a licence number. A page can put the verification link next to it.

It is current

The version you emailed in March is still the March version, wherever it ended up. A link is whatever it says today, with a date on it, and you email us to change it.

It answers questions

What are you looking for, where, from when, at what price. The things a recruiter has to email you to find out are just written down, which removes a round trip before anyone has spoken.

It responds

Theo's portfolio sorts itself by medium on demand. Paper is stuck in whatever order it was bound in, and a PDF is no better.

It is findable

Your resume is not a search result. A site at your own name is the thing someone finds when they look you up after the interview, which they will.

About these three

Jane, Priya, and Theo are not real people, and we would rather say so than let you assume otherwise. They are demonstration sites built to show how differently the same service handles three different careers.

Real client sites go up here as clients agree to it. Nobody's site gets shown without them saying yes first, which is the same answer you would want if it were your name on it.

Yours would be a fourth one.

Not one of these three with your details dropped in. Send us the resume and see what comes back within 72 hours.

Start your site See pricing